Saturday, July 21, 2012

Flight 93 & WTC 7

   On September 11, 2001 United Airlines 93 was scheduled to fly to San Francisco International Airport in San Mateo County. The mainstream media claimed that "Ziad Jarrah" had taken control of the cockpit about 46 minutes after takeoff.   


(Warning: This flightpath is not known)


     The mainstream media claims that cell phone calls were made at 30,000 feet, which in the year 2001, was not possible for cellular phone technology. Look it up. However, telephone calls made on telephones from the plane could have occurred. Next, the mainstream media also claims that the crew and passengers heroically attempted to regain control of the aircraft. No evidence at all exists for this claim. Where did the pilots or those remote controlling the plane want UA93 to wind up? The ultimate destination is not known.  
     Barry Chamish, a guest from Global Opposition to New Order Bolsheviks (GONOB) Radio, claimed that flight UA93 was intended to crash in New York, at WTC 7. However, the mainstream media speculates that the plane was intended to crash somewhere in Washington D.C., perhaps even at the Whitehouse. 

     On Global Opposition to New Order Bolsheviks (GONOB) Radio, guest Barry Chamish claims that flight United Airlines 93 was suppose to fly into the World Trade Center 7. Listen above @ 15:55 "One of the planes was suppose to hit Building 7 but instead it crashed in Pennsylvania, so they were stuck with a building full of explosions and fire marshals snooping..." so at 5:20 p.m "they brought down Building 7." 
     Ryan Dawson, the director of "War by Deception" in this video claims that it is possible that UA93 intended to fly into WTC 7. Dawson, makes an interesting point that if the plane was traveling at its average rate of speed, and heading towards WTC 7, it would have hit the building between 10:43 to 10:46 A.M. Many eyewitnesses heard sounds of explosions near WTC 7 at approximately 10:45A.M.   Proving the personnel on board the planes is extremely difficult but to look at the sequence of media reports.     
     WTC 7 seems like an awfully small target to hit, especially considering it's proximity to the WTC towers themselves. World Trade Center, was 47 stories tall, at 570 feet in height, it was less than half as high as the towers. The building was already pre-planted with controlled demolition that was set off after the twin towers completely collapsed. When Larry Silverstein, received a call from the fire department commander, and said "the smartest thing they could do is pull it" that means that the building was already pre-wired for demolition, weeks, months, or years in advance.
What I like to do is apply the Socratic or Scientific Method to determine if claims like this are true.  These are the steps you go through to know:
  1. Observation - What was actually observed with UA 93, we see crash wreckage in photographs. 
  2. Question - Was flight UA93 heading towards New York, Washington D.C., or neither? 
  3. Hypothesis  - Chamish claims this ; Mainstream media claims that.  
  4. Experiment - Test claims. 
  5. Conclusion - Results.             
       If you had planned on blowing up WTC 7, and if UA93 had struck WTC 7 then it would look like a reasonable chain of events.  Strategically, it would make more sense that UA93 was flying towards WTC 7 because the collapse could have been fraudulently attributed to damage more directly from the Twin Towers. However, if the planes were remote controlled, it wouldn't matter much if the passengers IN FACT apprehended the assailant who took control of the plane.  If UA93 was meant to crash at Shanksville, it would show that the United States military or civilians had put up a better fight against this 'al-Qaeda' adversary. Considering, that the plane did hit World Trade Center 7, the public would be outraged that our Air Force response did not stop three separate attacks against the World Trade Center. However, operation Northern Vigilance and Vigilant Guardian, created simulated errant aircrafts on FAA and military radar screens. These operations had intended to distract our NEADS and Canadian and United States Air Forces by the implementation of simultaneous drills. On June 1, 2001, the Chairman of the Joint chiefs of Staff released Instruction CJCSI 3610.01A.The CJCSI ordered Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld to revoke standing orders to shoot down errant or hijacked aircraft and instructed NORAD and the Pentagon to keep the Air Force grounded UNLESS given orders by the President, Vice President, or Secretary of Defense to shoot-down such aircraft. CJCSI order 3610.01A, combined with NEADS wargames, would reasonably impair normal air force response times. Thus, it is somewhat unclear why Flight 93 did not in fact make it to the intended target. 
      Consider war game operation Amalgam Virgo, had the picture of Osama bin Laden on the front page of the war game exercise!, It may have been the original plan to crash UA93 into WTC 7 at around 10:45 A.M., because communications may have been more heavily disrupted. With events at Pentagon and UA93 much more evidence is needed to prove these claims. The most evidence we currently have that indicates massive fraud and murder is the events at the Twin Towers, key data include: collapse time, symmetry of collapse, and acquisition of previously molten metal microspherules from Janette McKinlay and other survivors.  Although it is a compelling claim that United Airlines 93 had intended to fly into the WTC 7, this is still a hypothesis. 
Multiple news outlets reported explosions at WTC 7, compare eyewitness information by WTC Eyewitness that claimed "A bomb went off in the Lobby First and then a plane hit."
Did Flight 93 Crash in a field in Shanksville?
     This still does not indicate whether or not Flight 93 was aiming for WTC 7. This does change Ryan Dawson's estimated fly-path prediction, and the map of UA93 flightpath on Wikipedia. Nonetheless, when there are so many mainstream radio reports that a fourth explosion was observed at 10:45AM, it would make sense that this could have coincided with third intended plane crash in the WTC location. I believe this is still a plausible theory, however, the presence of this crater was detected by United States Geological Survey (USGS) in 1994! 
More reports on this to come.

No comments:

Post a Comment